THE DIGITAL QUESTION

In addition to the book I published this year I would like to present my view towards the digital medium we all committed to in the recent years. I am going to explain the technical side of it rather than the ideology.

Digital like Analogue is a signal.
As we all know it is composed of 0 and 1 mixed and organized endlessly to generate forms of information. An image is composed of pixels which are generated by this 0 and 1 coding system.
There is therefore a complex structure which enables the the coding system to create pixels, which then combined together make an image. So, in order to generate a digital image the information has to pass through different mediums which use a common language. But this flow can only exist if we transform the original transmission into something else.

When we take pictures, we are facing a real situation. What I mean by "real" is the three dimensional aspect of matters. We as human, live in a 3D world. What we experience usually remains 3D. Obviously, we can mention many other ways of experiencing which would involve other type of dimensions, but let's make it simple. If you want to really experience a car for instance, you will buy a car to obtain the real sensation because it relates to your 3D experience of being. The car and yourself stand in the same dimension and you can enjoy what the car is designed fully for. This product exists and you can touch it, it is material.

When you take pictures with film, you capture a scene from the 3D real world and transpose it onto a bi-dimensional surface we call a film. The information is transformed into a 2D surface but the film itself exists as a 3D reality. You have then condensed the 3D into a 2D because you need to print it, that is what still photographs are for. Therefore the transformation is direct.
And this 2D data will remain intact to print - it is fixed in time and matter (we could say frozen) The information remains 2D but exists as a 3D reality. In fact, the transformation is very limited even though we are changing dimension, but the aim of the film is to find a concrete way to produce a solution to display a 3D reality into an other form of 3D reality by using the 2D.
A becomes B which becomes A.

When you work with digital the logic is totally different. The 3D real is transformed into an other language which we call digital or virtual. The 3D is alien somehow to the result. The 3D becomes a data which we import into a virtual dimension, which is somehow not a dimension. It is a concept, a method, a processor in fact. Obviously, you can print from your digital files and create a 3D finish to the data by printing in multiple ways. Nevertheless, the original form of information, your picture is alien and doesn't exist. The digital is not a reality, it's a transformer of data for fast delivery. In fact, it has been designed to cut the costs ( film, developing, printing, etc..) and it is very satisfactory for the amateur who can see immediately if the picture is correct.
Digital is in fact brilliant to send information, to diffuse. That is why we are all turning towards this new medium in most industries as it costs almost nothing. Because in fact we managed to create something which is almost nothing but from which we became very dependent rapidly.
A becomes 0011001000010001111110 which becomes A

One of my main concern with digital photography is that most people are very excited about it but do not really understand its concept and limits. But here let's just concentrate on wedding photography as I guess we all want to share images of our special day with future generations.
The reality with digital is simple. First, as a object/support as a disc or DVD doesn't last more or less, more than 5 years. Softwares keep on changing and it is sometimes impossible to read the materials after few years. Computers are not meant to last more than five years and crash(we have to keep on feeding the economy and progress). The most sensible and secure way to protect your images is to purchase a separate hard drive. But still after all those protections and concerns, the original informations as a real form doesn't exist - it is virtual, it is digital.

Whereas a film exists and last for more than a century. And you can always back-up your images on a digital format by scanning your films. By using that method you obtain film quality straight from the camera without having to interfere with the digital world which actually make life more difficult than helping. The film quality has a better contrast and harmony than most digital cameras. It's a lens, a hole and a film - simple! The lens for the subject, the hole to pass the information, the film to receive the information. There is no purer way to do. And if you are a real professional you should be able to work this way with ease.

Digital generate problems at all stages and you actually spend more time trying to find the right way it looked as you saw it. What you see on the back of your camera or on your computer screen is a projection, and interpretation - this is not real. Think about it !

Digital is in fact great for the amateur, and we all have to use it as professional, but this medium has nothing to do with quality, but it is very helpful and fun. Digital exists because it is convenient and cheap. It is therefore less elitist and generate a stronger economy in that area. And consequently, like for anything else, quality goes down dramatically. It doesn't mean that there are no more good photographers, but bad quality usually overshadows the bests because of its scale and non caring.

In the end here are the two questions you have to ask yourself before searching for a wedding photographer. Do I want a cheap photographer who delivers average materials which will not last more than few years, or do I want a professional dedicated photographer who can provide me with the best at a reasonable price ?

Memories are priceless and deal with our profound dimension, but there is nothing like a beautiful image on paper to generate laughs and tears. Especially when you look at them 20 years later.

SCULPTING WITH LIGHT part 2 / The Dress

Welcome back.
Today is dedicated to the dress. One of the most important and expensive item. A bride without a special dress simply doesn't exist and it wouldn't make sense. It is one of the most important thing or maybe the most important one for the bride to be.
You can buy a dress from second hand wedding shops, you can also create one somehow with added details, you can rent one (or buy one you will sell after the wedding day to the same shop), you can keep it, dye it and wear it again for special occasions, you can keep it in your wardrobe for other generations, and finally you can simply go to a wedding dress designer. What ever you do, we know that you dress is something special, highly valuable in price or/and feelings.
Because a wedding dress HAS TO BE THE ONE. It reflects your personality and your other side we do not particularly know. Your wedding day is the right moment to express this other part of you. The style has to suit your world or its limits. There is always the fairytale factor and there is no reason to deny it. The shape has to embrace your physic. You have to feel right wearing it. It is like a very special second skin. It has to look simply special, like you at your best.
That is why taking good photographs of it is essential as it tells an other story on its own. You did put your love, time and inspiration in your dress and the details you are wearing. Obviously if you want great pictures it involves the photographer being with you before the ceremony while you are getting ready, but not always...And there are so many things to capture then...but let's focus on today's topic which the dress. How to take good pictures then ?
In this latest edition I tried to marry two visuals of different weddings to show how versatile it can be. From a technical point of view it is not as easy as it seems. First, you are dealing with an object which has generally a bright colour (white, creme, etc...) and therefore reflects the light. Your built-in light meter will always give you the wrong aperture whether you work with traditional film or new digital. It is normal, the dress is usually the only bright element within your environment, it reflects. You have the same phenomenon when you are watching a fire in the dark. By focusing on the bright part your retina retracts to focus only on that very particular subject. With a camera, the more light your have the more your close your aperture. If you follow you light meter you will always be 1 or 2 stops overexposed. That is why I always bring a separate light meter when working with film, or close automatically my aperture when shooting digital.
Also quite often try to focus manually except if the dress reveal quite a few ornaments you can grip your focusing system on. If the dress is mostly plain bright your camera will not understand where to focus. That is the same problem experienced in dark situations
So, how to shape the light then. Well, I personally think that it is very related to fashion and ways we are looking at objects we love in general. An object fully lit on a white background without nuances doesn't inspire much whereas working with shadows generates mystery and therefore desire.
Nowadays brides tend to choose more simple, nicely shaped designer dress, and it usually looks great on them. To take a photograph of the dress on it own can be a real deception. Those dresses are made to be looked at when they are worn ( Figure 1 on top). The main work of the designer is based on the shape of the bride. Don't they look great !
Figure 2 shows that by adding details in the frame you can translate more than what the dress looks like. You can create layers of interpretations and really get into the bride's conception of the dress. It shows why they knew it would work on them.

Figure 3 is a classic back of the dress shot many enjoy. Classic but you have to get it a the right moment, neither too late or early. It has to be when the dress starts making body with the bride. A gentle tension which renders harmony can be sensed then.

Figure 4 is transparency. Usually linked to the veil but not always. Some dresses have embroidery at the back or front. Some dress use it to create the sleeves. It is always amazing to get closer to those fine patterns and to capture a detail which take you to an other dimension, hours of work and art.
Figure 5 shows a medium shot of the front and back of each dress. Those shots are not easy as they are medium range and can feel bulky. They involve various techniques of lightning and composition with the milieu that make them interesting. You really have to work the whole frame as if you were working with clay. They are almost standard but not really with a lot of details and mini stories.

Figure 6 is focusing on details only and ambiance. On the left most of the dress was plain and what made it so special was this middle part ruban. Very rich item and full of history I decided to play with a very short depth of field and very little light to create some kind of hidden treasure.
The one on the right is light comparatively and I am playing with the flower which could be glowing outside in the field through the widow.

Figure 7 is an overall look at the milieu where the bride is getting ready. Sometimes as the dress is not so easy to photograph because of its simple design. Use that difficulty by using a dark and rich room that will make the dress stand out.

That's all for today. Many thanks